Kickstarter and Shared Value

 | 

January 2012

I really enjoyed reading Kickstarter’s Year of 2011 summary not least before it is beautifully designed. Such a treat for a business to indulge its fans in this way.

It is such a flourishing and joyous success story because it involves much more than the business’ own success. Indeed Kickstarter could not be a success story without the success of those people using for their enterprise: their incredible ideas; their inspiring and often stunning videos; their investment wins and product successes.

It’s a business that was created to enable other people to flourish, while it flourishes. It’s a business that has created enterprise in all of its glory and it has unlocked the potential of a vast pool of everyday people.

It is, in my view, a Shared Value business model because its customers gain value and flourish while it does. They actually depend on each other. And its customers are actually not customers, or consumers; they are creators, investors and active participants.

It’s a joy to see Kickstarter’s exponential growth in the last year and the attention it has received. Its success sends a clear signal to capitalism that the corporation of the future is not built on concentrated ownership, consumerism and shareholder wealth only. It is built on Shared Value business models and prosperity for all stakeholders.

Alternative Currencies (WSJ piece)

Alternative Currencies as published in the Wall Street Journal (featuring myself!).

The founder of a social network of globetrotting adventure-travelers called Hub Culture is an evangelist, of sorts, for peer-to-peer currencies. “You’re going to see inexorably, the movement towards peer to peer finance,” Stan Stalnaker says. “People will trade individually and independently among each other, all around the world. It’s going to happen, there’s no denying it,” he insists.

Actually they edited a whole load of stuff I said on film to them about new forms of value and value exchange. I am less interested in the currency itself but the sorts of transactions and motivations for peer-to-peer trading. Peer to peer transactions, whatever they may be, democratizes and decentralizes the institutional models that we are used to. It allows for much greater control and decision-making around trading, because the traders (peers) can steer the value. So with a peer-to-peer bank, the stakeholders (the peer network), can decide where money is lent and invested, versus the bank doing this.

Incubator of Social Movements (instead of Product Ventures)

 | 

 | 

I just read about Virgance on Worldchanging’s write-up and insights from the Sustainable Brands International Conference, just past this June in Monterey.  Virgance is truly an icon of Service Thinking and Post Consumerism: a business incubator set-up not to establish highly branded consumer products, but instead to focus on companies whose product is “good” and to create value from movements and collaborative business models. Virgance is a business that creates ventures that create value through social movements and networks. It used to be that producing a beautifully designed product and selling social (product) status was a route to both success and fame (think Apple, Method, One Laptop Per Child, Toyota Prius an on..); today, there are emerging markets which value by building community and creating change.

In their words:

“Some companies make car stereos or scented candles or frozen tater tots. But how might a company produce “positive social change… What if activism is an emerging market? If a for-profit company did the type of work that non-profits often do, but did it more efficiently, would people trust it the same way they trust non-profits? What if everything the company did was completely transparent? What if it was open source? If we can create this kind of company, and succeed, how many other companies would follow our example? Along the way, could we change the face of the business world itself?”

These are the guys behind Carrotmob, which does the opposite of boycotting and instead brings together “mobs” of shoppers that influence socially responsible purchasing by literally mobbing areas and being loyal to these type of businesses. It’s a bit like the IKEA sale, but driven not by cheap furniture and cut prices but instead by social values and sustainability. And also One Block Off The Grid, with the tagline “Consumer power meets solar power”. IBOG brings groups of consumers together who want to get solar energy and reduces the cost. This is something we talked about at live|work forever, with ourselves and to our clients (some of whom were energy companies), but we never did make it happen. At OZOlab, also a business incubator for sustainable ventures, we applied service thinking and service models to our consumr product businesses, (such as a cleaning product that was actually a refil service system), but we were never as pioneering as to drive a wholly new paradigm of value creation. Our investors would not have understood it.

A big shout out to Virgance for truly seeing that the world needs new types of business models and ways of building brands, which do not emphasis the need to OWN something pretty. There is money to be made in community, movements and collaborative business models.

Micro-financing Climate Risk

 | 

I’ve been researching the emerging market of Climate Adaptation for a consulting project (managing what happens around us as our climate changes) and came across a smart micro-finance model for financing risk insurance for those who live on under $4 per day. “The World’s First Insurance Intermediary for The Poor”, MicroEnsure is an insurance intermediary dedicated to serving the poor throughout the developing world with an affordable and appropriate range of insurance products.

MicroEnsure are effectively and aggregate working on behalf of the poor around (weather-related) risk issues.

Given Climate Change and Adaptation are a large risk issue to poor communities, it’s a timely model. It will be interesting to see emerging BOP opportunities, like this, around climate change or other environmental drivers and adaptation needs. Lots of opportunity here rich nations…

Financing adaptation is an emerging market, I think?

Ps. FT Awarded MicroEnsure with a Sustainable Banking Award.

Common Good

Via Worldchanging.

Please enable Javascript and Flash to view this Blip.tv video.

I think this is a small example of the changing nature of the commons and frame of our economy: from self-interest to collective good (or collective commons)?

Nike, Best Buy and Creative Commons have come together to make it easy for business to share research on sustainability patents. It recreates and re-enables the Research Exemption – which allows academics to do research on patents held by companies. Green Exchange creates the voluntary private legals tools to make it fast and easy to share research: academic, corporate or commercial use, increasing the flow, use and reuse of property.

Patents are property – valuable, owned, guarded and an act of self-interest – and are a reflection of the industrial mindset. Garrett Hardin published his influential article “The Tragedy of Commons” in 1968, which described how individuals typically act independently in their own self-interest, ultimately destroying a shared limited resource even when it is clear that it is not in anyone’s long term interest. Over depletion of fish stocks is an obvious real-world example of his thesis today. As is peak oil: we’ve used it all up, now it’s getting more expensive (for everyone) and an energy security issue (for everyone).

Self-interest and wealth creation has been disconnected from the forms of capital that enable it (natural and human capital). Green Exchange challenges this paradigm because the concern, “sustainability”, is a common concern – it effects every business, competitor or not.

It’s a small step but a significant indicator, I think… Our commons are OUR commons.

The New Connected Age Emerges from NOLA

 | 

Originally published on PSFK and Sustainablelifemedia

I’ve just been co-presenting (with Rachel Botsman of OZOlab) and attending Feast Social Innovation Conference in New Orleans. If you don’t already know the smart team of ‘Millennials’ behind it, you should know: they are Alldaybuffet and this was the second in their next generation conferences and social entrepreneur events. What marked their event on Friday, February 6th as special is a combination of things, which may in some ways all add up to a loose definition of the term “Social Innovation”. Never before have I been to a conference where the ‘place’ was equally relevant and rich as the ‘content’ of the day.

The words I’d like to use to summarize this special event are Connected, Restorative, Humanistic and Beacon; I’ve provided my commentary on each one below. Please hold these words lightly and let them not get in the way of the stories behind them.

Connected:

Social innovators come together to drive forward prosperity, collaboratively. This was apparent from day one of Feast gathering. Never have I felt so immediately connected to the culture of a city in such a short time. The event kicked-off on Thursday evening with Robbie Vitrano, the founder of Trumpet, hosting an impromptu speaker dinner at his large studio in the 9th Ward area (an area significantly affected by Katrina). Speakers were mixed with locals who’d returned to the city from the floods, with Robbie’s family, with entrepreneurs and the Feast team. We were all there with a shared goal – driving business as a force for good and building “social capital” as Jay Parkinson of Hello Health describes it. We are the stakeholders of social capital, a yet undefined or measured value.

Sounds real simple to say it, but social innovators are Connectors. This tribe, myself included, measures value as impact of collective good: we share or give away ideas, provide support and advice for no expectation of any economic return and mix together whatever tribe we’ve come from. There is very little that is proprietary or not wholly exposed.

Social innovators are also Connected thinkers: they see the world as whole relationships and are often addressing systems issues, because they are able to see them. Hello Health, presented to the Feast audience, is a powerful response to a broken system – US healthcare.  Doctor Parkinson built his whole business model on an insight that the current healthcare system is siloed and completely disconnected. In his words, “the only thing connecting the patient and doctor is the waiting room”; patients are treated like a commodity –they exist to make transactions possible and generate more wealth within the healthcare sector.
“If I do a horrible job managing your asthma, I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars; if I do a great job I might get $100” says Jay.  He believes that being a patient currently sucks; for many it is financially out of reach, it is highly complex and involves little communication of shared information between practitioners. There’s no one central platform for your health.

Jay has created a connected “Product-Service System” for local health care. He took the middleman out of the process – insurers and surgeries – and in place he put a networked service and invited his customers to become stakeholders. In his words, “no longer working in a silo from my patients but building social capital together”.  His model is a bit like Zipcar for health because it takes the burden out of the paying for a commodity designed for obsolescence and in exchange puts a pay-as-you-go membership model that benefits all stakeholders. And it’s wholly connected.

Woody Tasch’s hypothesis, author of Slow Money, is that money has become too fast (along with everything else), and as a result we’ve become completely disconnected from it. He’s right; and what greater evidence of our lack of vested relationship with money than the financial crisis. Fast money is made at the expense of society and the planet. When A LOT of money is made some of it is given to philanthropy to clean up the mess the fast spending created. There is no social capital in that way of making money.

Woody’s observation is that we’ve been too focused on “markets” and not “places”, when once upon a time we used to trade in marketplaces. He challenges the logic of 20% return on VC investment in a venture as a success, when we are subtracting such significant amounts of capital from the local economy. He asks “What if 50% of assets were invested within 50 miles of the marketplace?”. What if smaller returns became the norm in exchange for preservation and restoration of other forms of capital such as ecosystems, soil and communities? What if the connection between capital wealth and its provenance were once again made?

Restorative:

Does “restorative” resound with you at all lately? Are we in a moment of restoration? Possibly the oratory and policy development exuding from the White House of late might suggest so. The thing about NOLA is that it’s been ‘restoring’ itself since 2005 post Katrina. This is what was so fascinating about the conference: at times it was hard to tell if we were learning from the speakers on the day or the stories, evidence and people in the city who have ‘restored’ and transformed it. NOLA has become a leader for educational innovation because it was broken and exposed as broken when the city crashed under the pressure of nature’s force. John Alford of NOLA 180, KIPP charter school, is leading educational restoration. 107 out of 128 schools in New Orleans were failing; it’s the young and mission-driven generation who are moving into these schools and treating pupils like stakeholders in their school.

Woody describes an emerging Restorative Economics – because “we are past the point of sustainability”. And he’s right, we are. This planet, our economies and many of our social systems are broken. Restorative Economics, or “Nurture Capital”, is a new wealth creation from restoration – like the KIPP schools.
Brian Bordainick, age 23, spoke about his ambitious project to raise $1.85M to build a community football field and track on the campus of Carver High School – a recovery school. With no experience building ventures, raising finance or working in sport, Brian entered the Restorative Economy to create a job for himself with a mission. He is a story that the citizens of America should follow and the “Fame Game” story of our time.

What if instead of feeling bad about the mess in this country we took pride in restoring it?

Humanistic:

It goes without saying that social innovation is humanistic; it’s emerged from (the growing) tribes who are born with altruistic values or come to these values through a significant shift that happens in their lives. Katrina kicked New Orleans hard, but what’s kicked back is a generation of idealistic change agents and a city that could actually become the beacon of our times. (The rest of the country and world is feeling a different sort of kick right now). Dan Pink describes these emerging tribes and their work as the dawning of the Conceptual Age.

Alldaybuffet exemplify this tribe. Michael Karnjanaprakorn presented their new business model and social venture at the conference. The idea: an incubator that will invest in talent and passion to make something happen (human passion) versus an idea measured on how fast it will make money. Theirs is a fund that will invest in people to create good ideas that create social capital, instead of judging the numbers and short-term return of a business model. That is a new paradigm right? Have you heard of investors funding people and their values? Believe it, as it’s happening. They are gaining significant traction.

Team Alldaybuffet ARE the generation of the Conceptual Age. They’re young, smart, loaded with values and rejecting fast money jobs. This breed have built massive networks of support and interest, and with it are incubating social ventures. Thus far Alldaybuffet has been built on a platform of values, and a network of disciples and supporters.

Beacon:

This is a provocation rather than a discussion that actually came out of the Feast conference. The kickback from Katrina has resulted in a city that is fast becoming a ‘beacon’ of excellence in reforming charter education and developing green buildings. It is a city shaping the definition of Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship. And it is a magnet for “smart, idealistic change agents” in Vitrano’s words.

What if the lessons and innovation, and talent, were exported to other parts of the country and in exchange seed investment and talent invested social capital back into the city? I’ve been dreaming about brand NOLA in the 21st century, which then made me think about others parts of the country where ground-up innovation is driving greater prosperity. What if the country was divided into centers or “beacons” of excellence, each one building on the unique cultural, social, environmental and economic attributes of its place (the “marketplace”). But instead of siloe’d entities, the beacons actually exist to drive leadership and innovation in other parts of the county? Centers would cross-pollinate and exchange social capital with other centers.

It’s just a thought. Whatever way, I would urge business leaders, entrepreneurs, citizensof this country and the rest of the world to spend some time connecting with the innovators, like Robbie Vitrano, in New Orleans.