The Shared Value Academy

 | 

 | 

November-December 2011

There are four years between now and the Brazil Olympics in 2016, which is enough time to prototype and then scale at least 10 new social ventures with shared value potential…

I have talked a lot (below) about the need for business to shift from the current economic paradigm – corporate-consumer-capitalism – to one that seeks to create shared value through solving social/environmental/economic problems together with untapped ‘entrepreneurs’ or the new generations of ‘leaders’ in the communities that face them. I believe that global business, and in particular consumer brands, are a strong platform to enable this shared value approach because of their vast and sophisticated supply and value chains and their wide consumer reach. In this context, corporate-consumer business becomes a template to unlock value in others and share the benefits. There are, after all, a lot of people – and a lot of changemakers – on this planet.

 

There are increasing examples of this model framed as ‘Inclusive Business’, ‘Enterprise Development’ and ‘Hybrid Value Chain’. All of these approaches were on the basis of a blended value chain, enabling collaborative entrepreneurship and value to be shared between producer and consumer. But more evidence is needed. As global consumer businesses seek growth in emerging markets where planetary, social challenges and corrupt government is most felt, this new frontier of wealth creation needs to expand and be legitimised within the global economy.

In talks with the world’s largest consumer goods company this week in response to Paul Polman’s latest rhetoric on long-term growth in emerging markets, I suggested the need for an ‘academy’ for social business and shared value models. The ‘Shared Value Academy’ would be run and placed geographically in an area where there are social challenges to address and innovation and human potential to unlock. Read More…

Social Prosperity and Growth?

 | 

 | 

November-December 2011

Could one brand commit to the success of 10 new radically innovative social ventures, in market and delivering high impact results, by 2016 Olympics?

‘Social prosperity’ and ‘growth’ in Brazil are two concepts that don’t currently sit well amid the Capitalist economy. Indeed they are two things that don’t sit that well together in large parts of the global economy, which of we are seeing today. There is considerable buzz in Brazil, in almost every conversation I have had, about the ‘consumption potential’ of the Expanding Middle (as classified by Goldman Sachs) in Brazil. In other words Brazil’s classified “E” and “D” consumer segments moving up through the class hierarchy with more potential to purchase (in many cases debt-based purchases).

Nor does the term ‘Green Economy’ sit well with social prosperity. A term that is being bandied around with Rio +20, the World Cup, Rio Olympics 2016, Brazil’s growth in sugarcane ethanol production in mind. All eyes are on Brazil in the next few years. NGOs and world leaders are gathering here next year in 2012 to present their concepts and push the ‘Clean Revolution’ (the Climate Group’s key message) or ‘Green Economy’ (Rio +20 official message) i.e., environment and green growth at the intersection of economies and job creation. Read More…